The Leader’s Elevator Pitch


The elevator pitch is ubiquitous with entrepreneurship. Pick up almost any book on entrepreneurship and as sure as the Moon goes around the Earth there will be a section espousing the importance of it . The elevator pitch is what an aspiring (or even more experienced) entrepreneur looking for funding would say to Bill Gates if he were riding with him in an elevator. It’s tenant is that you have approximately 30 seconds to give your pitch and secure permission for a follow up phone call or meeting at some point in the future.

While this is fine for the entrepreneur bumping into a chance walking pile of cash it has severe limitations for the aspiring leader looking for more then just the predictable seed capital. Leaders far more often need things other then cash, things which do not have a ready made system for funnelling applicants through. Things like talent, contacts, goodwill, mentors, permissions and so on. In these situations you are going to need to communicate far more then just a 30 second business plan but will probably not have that much more time to do it in. Of cause if you do have ample time then no problem but more then often, even if we are making small talk at a dinner party we have less time then we might. Why? because of the leaders need to listen.

  • Balancing the need to communicate your vision with the need to listen

Leaders get things done by knowing as much about the people they deal with as possible. They know what they want, need, hope for, dream about and care about. They know what drives people and how to get people to do what they never thought was possible. There is only one real way to do this and that is to listen to them. This is especially important at the start of any new connection. This is the time when the leader must have his senses at his most fine, he needs to know what he is dealing with, whether the person in front of him is a diamond in the rough or the one bad apple in the barrel. This means active listening, it means leading the conversation in such a way as to have the other person talk about himself. Listening is key.This leads to a paradox. You must listen, but at the same time you must communicate your vision with passion and clarity. What to do?

Simple. You must use an extended version of the elevator pitch. One tailored to the specifics of what you are trying to achieve. The normal elevator pitch assumes that what you are looking for is funding and all you need to do is communicate your business plan in 30 seconds and you’re good. The leaders elevator pitch on the other had must communicate three separate things.

  1. The Vision
  2. The Win
  3. The Need

Vision

The whole point of this exercise is that you have a condensed version of your vision you can roll out on a moments notice. I know you can talk about your vision for hours on end once you get going but that’s not what we’re after here. Carefully craft it so it covers all the main points while evoking as much emotion as possible (emotion first, logic comes in the next step).

  • Tell a story… people don’t interrupt stories

When your describing your vision it can be very helpful to do so in the form of a story either about you or someone you know. The reasons for this are many. We can engage with stories much better, can remember their contents easier and they allow us to build an emotional connection to the characters (especially useful if you’re one of them) but perhaps one of the better reasons to use stories is that people are trained not to interrupt stories. If your talking in generalities about the state of the world people often can’t help jumping in with their opinions and ruining your flow (doesn’t happen when your talking with other leaders ^^). But tell a story interspersed with what ever information is relevant to your pitch and you can often get the through the whole thing without your listener taking over the conversation once (You’ve given him plenty of time to speak, now its your turn :P ).

  • Name your vision so you can instantly refer back to it in later conversation/s

Once you have created an emotional state in your listener you can get it back later on in the conversation by giving the vision a name relevant to the story you told. For example if you were telling a story about a crash you had with an empty ice cream van that got a lot of laughs you can refer back to it as the “ice cream smash” or similar. This is what great comedians do in their routines. When a joke goes especially well they will refer back to it later in the performance for instant laughs. They don’t even need to do anything funny. Just refer back to it. This works with things other than humour. If you create a sense of awe, reverence, humility, gratitude, determination or whatever in your listener you can get it back later without having to go through the whole process again. In NLP this is called anchoring and it’s a important element of emotion guidance.

Win

The win is a short positive thing you have done to move the vision closer to reality.

  • Establishing credibility

This is not about stating your degrees or your experience or anything else that has little or no relevance to your vision. If your vision is to build special schools for mentally challenged children in third world countries this is not the place to mention your 30+ years experience in the field. You should have done that earlier. This is about establishing credibility of the project not about you. This is about showing that something is happening to bring THIS vision closer to reality. It could be about the team of top notch professionals you’re putting together (especially if he knows some of them or respects the credentials you can throw out about them). It could be about the expedition you took to scout locations and meet with local government officials. It could also be about some press you received in regards to the project.

  • An example, preferable with numbers or details

The best examples of wins are small pilot projects with measurable results. For example. “We set up a summer school in a temporary shelter with volunteers from around the country to teach 200 children for 8 weeks earlier this year. Everyone had a blast. It was awesome.” Think you’ll find it difficult to find this kind of win for your vision? Create one! You should always be on the look out for opportunities to create these kind of wins. Not only people outside your project but also those inside need wins with measurable results to keep momentum going and to keep the belief in the vision strong. If the project is still in it’s very early stages then mention something solid that you’ve been doing to get the project off the ground.

  • People have heard it all before

Sharing wins the vision has had, no matter how small, is crucial to your credibility. People have heard it all before. There are no limit of people who talk a good game but have nothing come of it. You must demonstrate that you are not one of these people before they can take any request, no matter how small, seriously. (This all assumes that you ARE NOT one of these people, if you are, I suggest you read “Getting Things Done” by David Allen to get you started.

Need

Of cause, all this preparation and communication is not just so the other guy can have an entertaining time. The purpose of the pitch as a whole is to move you further towards your next goal. Remember, your next goal is different from your vision.

Your need is the one thing you do not currently posses, that this person is most likely to be able to provide, that will move you towards your next goal.

Examples of things you might need

  • People (“I really need someone who understands how to put together a funding application, You know someone who might know someone.”)
  • Experience (“I really need to improve my public speaking, would you know of any opportunities to do this?”)
  • View-points/advice (“I really need another person to give me input on this, what do you think?”)

Ask for something that is actionable, for example, don’t say you need money because no one, even if they have the cash, is going to write you out a check right there and then, a better thing to ask for instead is a contact, like, “What I really need right now is a VC….. you don’t happen to know any do you?”. Notice that you are not asking if your listener if he is a VC, your asking if he knows someone else who is (If he’s a VC you should already know that by now!). Nor are you directly asking for your objective. This is especially important if what you are looking for is reasonably rare, after all, for any given ability or resource there are only so many people who has it but far more who know someone else who has it.

If you feel you’ll get the chance for extended conversation detach the need from the vision and the win. Let the other guy talk for a bit between them and bring it up again at a strategically placed point later on. It sounds less like a sales pitch.

How the pitch fits into the big picture

The successful pitch is a combination of your credibility, your pitch and luck.

  • Credibility

Your credibility is formed before the pitch. It is the sum of your dress, speech, social group, surroundings, reputation, toys (read cars, planes, jewellery, and other obvious displays of wealth), looks, body language, credentials, achievements, track record and character. All these things are important because they can be communicated without telling someone about them (remember you need to listen more then speak). These are all things you should be working on all the time. Anything which builds your credibility as someone who can get things done is immeasurably useful. Some of the things on this list are considered superficial and shallow by many people such as looks and wealth and while they may say little on their own about your worth as a person they speak volumes about your ability to make things happen and should be treated as such. Displays of wealth do not need to be flashy to communicate their presence effectively. Remember the old persuasion adage ”people sometimes believe what they are told but they never doubt what they conclude”. If you have a choice between telling someone about something that makes you credible and showing them, show them.

  • Pitch

Remember, the pitch is the often one of the first times you are giving a piece of yourself to someone new. It is an important first impression. When you pitch your vision to someone it should be done under the assumption that this person could well turn into a long term friend, mentor, contact, business partner or whatever. Don’t exaggerate or, god forbid, lie in your pitch. This is your vision, distilled down into a few short paragraphs. You should treat it like a part of your own soul.

  • Luck

Of course, even with perfect preparation in perfect conditions, sometimes lady luck just isn’t on your side. It doesn’t matter if you have the credibility of Richard Branson and the pitching ability of Steve Jobs, if the guy you’re talking to just doesn’t know anyone who’s what you’re after, tough. But don’t let that worry you, after-all, this is a numbers game. You talk to X people, X/5 fail your credibility test, X/15 are interested in what you say, X/45 are interested to help and X/90 actually can help. These numbers are just made up by the way. They illustrate the principle well enough. It’s up to you to improve your pitch and credibility to lower those numbers. (Hint: The best way to lower the number of people who fail your credibility test is to carefully pick where you hang out).

Finally, remember that sometimes you don’t have to pitch at all! If what you need is obvious and the situation you’re in is completely built around your need just let the other person talk. Immerse yourself in their world. Bill Clinton was a master at this. He would never ask for someone’s vote or support when talking to people at parties or events. Just put his full undivided attention on whoever he was with. That’s all he needed to do.

- James

Did you like this article? Then share:

  • Print
  • PDF
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • MisterWong
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

The Pursuit of Pro

Back in my World of Warcraft days we had a phrase for what the business world would call excellence. We called it “Being pro”. Being pro meant doing whatever was necessary to gain just that little extra advantage. It meant that you took the biggest area of improvement in your game and you worked on it until it no longer was. Then you switched over to the thing that would make the next biggest difference. Then the next and so on and so on. There was no stopping, every time you thought there was no possible way to improve your character or your performance you kept looking until you found something else. Months turned into years and while some advantages came and went as the game evolved, some stayed and became part of your personal repertoire and was what made you a great player.

I’ve heard this called many things. Both excellence and mastery spring immediately to mind. I call it the “pursuit of pro”. They are all variants of the same thing with very similar tenants. It is not a goal, it is not something we hope to achieve. It is an all encompassing philosophy of how you do things. It is the little voice in the back of your head that constantly says “How can we do this better? Faster? More efficiently and with less effort?

Leadership is a sales job as much as anything. You must sell your people that the vision you are espousing is possible. That YOU have the ability to make it possible. How do you sell that ability? How do you show people that you can do what no one else says can be done?

Clearly you must sell your ability as a leader of people, to be able to deal with people on a regular basis, to motivate, to coordinate and resolve disputes. Obviously you must be able to persuade, empower and make people feel good about themselves. But it is not enough. As a leader you must not only be able to show you have the people skills but that you embody the belief systems that will forge the team into what it needs to be.  As much as anyone can be, the leader IS the team. Its beliefs, its morals and its modus operandi. Everything from your ability to attract the best talent to being able to develop and motivate the talent you have is dependent on being near the top of the game yourself. If not at the top then defiantly on a par with the top. Note that you don’t have to be at the top of the same game as those in your team. Obviously if you are a marketer and you have a programmer in your team you don’t have to know programming at his level in order to earn his respect and belief. But you damn well do need to know marketing at his level of programming and be able to improve at the same rate as him. The bigger and grander your vision the greater the importance to attract a team of the best and in order to do that you need to be the best yourself. That is the entry ticket to play the game. And that is where the pursuit of pro comes in.

It is what allows you to reach the highest level of performance. It is the purpose in purposeful practice talked about in the book “Bounce” by Matthew Syed. In this book Syed builds on many of the principles found in Malcolm Gladwell’s book, “Outliers”. He adds that the 10,000 hour rule of world class performance only applies if the practice being done is purposeful (see this post for more on the 10,000 hour rule). That is to say, if the practitioner is actively trying to improve. If he is just going through the motions then he might as well not be doing anything. This is what separates a world class performer from just another guy who has 30+ years experience in this or that industry.

I recently read “The Leader Who Had No Title” by Robin Sharma and I loved 10 pages in particular, 64-74, when the characters discuss mastery. They introduce the concept of FMOB (the First, the Most, the Only and the Best). To me, striving for that ideal just about sums up what the pursuit of pro is all about.

Here are my favorite quotes from those 10 pages.

“Mastery, Anna offered. ‘committing yourself to mastery at what you do, mastery at your craft–whether your craft is selling staplers or educating children–is the only standard to operate under in these change-rich times. Anything less and you’ll be left behind. The comedian Steve Martin said it really well when he advised, ‘Be so good that people cannot ignore you’”

“Expect more from yourself than anyone around you could ever expect from you. Play in the big leagues, Blake! Just fly up into the thing space of rare air. Most people set such low standards for themselves. They aim so low–and then, sadly, reach that goal. And so you’ll find that you don’t have a lot of company out on the extra mile.”

However you look at it, the pursuit of pro is the first step to great leadership. After all, if you cannot bring out the best in yourself how can you hope to bring out the best in others?

So how do you go about developing the pursuit of pro mindset? You can do it in many ways. By far the best way I’ve found is to immerse yourself in an environment where the pursuit of pro is an integral part of the communities DNA. Even better, to be part of a team that is likewise and where the group performance rests on the individual ability of every team member. Your teammates will, over time, pound the following mantra into your head. “Be better” “Practice harder and smarter” “Never quit” “How good I was yesterday means nothing only how good I am being right now.” That’s what WoW did for me. It’s what team sports did for many of the top performers of the last few generations. It’s what the military and often the general will to thrive and thus survive did for generations before that. What it is that gives you the attitude matters not. All that matters is that you get it.

Of course this is not to say that you must have had an experience like this in order to be able to understand and live the principle. Another quote from those 10 pages mentioned above….

“BIW just means Best in World. In my work here at this hotel, I continually ask myself a very power self-coaching question: “What would the person who is the best in the world at what I do be doing in this very moment?” Once I get the answer, I immediately refocus myself and get down to the business of doing only that which will create the largest results and the biggest impact. My goal here, each and every day, is to be the best in the world at my craft of housekeeping. And that’s how I continually move closer towards mastery,”

…. Just forming the habit to constantly ask yourself this on a regular basis can do the job. Attach the thought to an object or action that you often do throughout the day, whenever you do that action, pass that place or see that object, ask yourself that question. Eventually it will become as much a part of you as the food you eat and air you breathe.

George Leonard, author of “Mastery – The Keys to Success and Long Term Fulfillment” got it first from his flight training and experience and latter from his practice of Aikido. “Mastery” is a great read by the way, indispensable to anyone who is series about developing the pursuit of pro attitude.

Gordon Ramsay got it first from his cut-short football career long before he opened his first restaurant.

Donald Trump got it from playing varsity football, American football and baseball.

The list goes on and on and on.

Wherever you get it, however you get it.  Find a way to go and get it. It’s THAT important.

- James

Did you like this article? Then share:

  • Print
  • PDF
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • MisterWong
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

10,000 Hours of Leadership

I recently finished reading Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell. He’s the same guy that gave us “The Tipping Point” back in 2000.

The book breaks up into 3 points each one of which builds on the next but it was the first point that for me made me sit up in my seat, gaze up at the overly bright Cypriot sky and think “Holy shit” (I love those moments). Here’s the insight…

There is a magic number of hours that you have to spend improving yourself at something in order to be “World Class” at it. 10,000 hours. For example, among pianists graduating from music school, the ones who would get the best venues, jobs, ect, were the ones who had done at least 10,000 total hours of practice. The merely good ones were the ones that had done 8,000 hours and the also-rans destined for teaching music in high-school had done 4,000. That’s amazing. The difference between world class and merely good in this case was 20% more practice. :o But that 20% extra is A LOT when you’re talking about this many hours. The book uses this and other findings to once and for all dispel the myth of “innate” genius.

While reading through the book the question in the back of my mind was how on earth you would apply this to Leadership development? I mean, what do you classify as “doing leadership”? Very tough question. Leadership is, after all, a subject made up of many other subjects and there are many things leaders do but it’s very hard to nail it down. Very hard to point at someone and say “Look! He’s doing leadership!”. So what are the things that make up leadership?

  • Vision
  • Aligning People to that vision in the form of one on one or team building

I can think of two activities that fit both of these things very well.

The first is public speaking.

The second is coaching.

I would also include research and study into the subject in the form of books, seminars and audio courses (don’t think you’d be able to get away with just doing theoretical stuff). I’d say that, in total, I’ve put around 600 hours into my leadership development effort thus far. That was in the last year so at this rate I would pass the 10,000 hour mark in 16 years… Mmmmmmmmmmm.

This really hit home to me just what a commitment it is to want to be world class at something.

Now, the book sheds a lot of light on the nature of real genius and about how circumstances shape success but it also throws an interesting spanner in the works of the specialist vs generalist debate by showing that the debate is actually pretty null.

Let’s take Picasso as our example. Most people will have heard of the much quoted story of Picasso sitting in a cafe and being approached by a woman who was thrilled to meet the famous painter.

Woman: “Oh you simply MUST paint me”

Picasso: Sure thing dude. (Can’t remember the exact wording here)

Picasso pulls out a paintbrush and paints her in a single stroke

Woman: “My God! It’s perfect!”….. “How much do I owe you?”

Picasso: “$10,000″

Woman: * shocked* “But it only took you a few seconds!”

Picasso: “Madam, it took me my whole life”

Now we’ll all admit that Picasso was a genius and he certainly did put in his 10,000 hours but so what? So do many other painters all around the world, almost all of whom are penniless and unknowns. What makes the difference? Why is it that we all have heard of Picasso and why is it that his artwork sells for such huge sums even during his own lifetime? Something very rare in the art world.

I believe it lies in the mixing of specialism and generalism. As well as being a very good painter Picasso was also a very good businessman. Did he spend as much time on his business skills as his painting? Probably not but he did not neglect those skills either. Nor the people skills that are required to know how to persuade, cajole and sell both himself and his ideas.

My thinking is that becoming a very successful person requires that you be both a specialist AND a generalist.

  • Focus most of your time on your 10,000 hour passion.
  • Build your tugboat skills on the side.
  • Eventually your tugboat skills will start to approach 10,000 hours too.

Therein lies true genius.

- James

Did you like this article? Then share:

  • Print
  • PDF
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • MisterWong
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Management: Tribal Leadership

[This weeks blog post is brought to you from a local internet cafe as my internet is down at the moment.]

I love models. Specifically I love models of the way humans behave and interact. Many of my favorite books have been ones that have given me a new tool for helping me understand why people do what they do and I recently found another one… Yay!

A few months ago I watched a speech given at the TED conference by management consultant and professor at USC, Dave Logan. In said speech Dave gave an outline of a model he had been working on for well over a decade to help the leaders of tribes (groups of people between 20-150) lead. Well I was intrigued and dropped his book that he was pushing into my amazon cart and left it there until time came for my next shipment.

After having read his book something brillant happened. I started seeing the model everywhere. Suddenly the people at the supermarket weren’t just complaining, they were complaining “in a stage 2 culture”. The seminar audio series I was listening to wasn’t just motivating people, it was “motivating people to adopt a stage 3 mindset”.

I highly recommend that you click through to the video I linked above and watch the presentation for yourself, or even better, read the book, but for the sake of completeness here’s a quick overview of the model:

  • Stage 1: Life sucks
  • Stage 2: My life sucks
  • Stage 3: I’m great (and you’re not)
  • Stage 4: We’re great (and they’re not)
  • Stage 5: Life is great

Now one of the author’s assertions is that if you are at a certain stage in the ladder you cannot “skip runs” so to speak. If you’re at the ‘life sucks’ stage you must first go through ‘my life sucks’ before you can continue to move up. This revelation makes SO much sense to me and explains why trying to pump up people at stage one just does not work! It also means, interestingly, that you can’t get to ‘we’re great (and they’re not)’ before going through ‘I’m great (and you’re not)’. This is one of those rare times I’ve come across someone pushing the idea that great personal achievement comes before great leadership, something that resonates with me intensely.

I also find interesting to look at my own progression over the years… I think (and I know that being objective about yourself is very tough) that for quite a long time I’ve been mostly in an ‘I’m great (and you’re not)’ mentality… I think that since I’ve started studying practicing what I’ve read, I’ve started to move from that thinking to more of a stage 4 mindset however it’s defiantly still an early stage 4 mindset.

Long, long way to go yet :)

- James

Did you like this article? Then share:

  • Print
  • PDF
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • MisterWong
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Tools: The Personal MBA

Books. A brilliant way to access the wisdom of great thinkers and doers.

Cheap (with Amazon), accessible (with Amazon) and plentiful (you get the picture). Very very plentiful. The best guess I could find for number of book titles in the world is 65 million.

That’s a lot of books.

How on earth is anyone who is in the “I don’t know what I don’t know” phase of leadership development meant to know what is worth reading and what isn’t?

Well, for quite a number of years my approach to reading was a stumble and pray strategy and it produced “some” good results. Most of the books I read though, while  not useless to someone who knew next to nothing, could have been much better. The result of this lack of guidance was a factor in why I didn’t read as much as I could have for quite a while.

However, I then got a stroke of good luck (yay for serendipity). I tripped over Josh Kaufman’s Personal MBA (PMBA) website. Josh created this website with the vision that you don’t have to spend a fortune on an MBA to get a good business education. While I was stumbling around not reading much, he was reading books by the thousand! Josh has created a list of what he considers to be the 99 best in the categories he considers of most importance for a successful business leader.

Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested: that is, some books are to be read only in parts, others to be read, but not curiously, and some few to be read wholly, and with diligence and attention. - Sir Francis Bacon

All of the books on the PMBA that I have read so far, fall very much into the last category. The list’s brilliance is down in most part to Josh’s own laser sharp understanding about business and leadership, which is very evident from his own blog articles, videos and projects.

Since I started my quest to understand leadership development I have read a lot of books and I usually have some trepedation before starting one (I hate not finishing books once I’ve started them).However everytime I pick up a PMBA book I know that it’s going to end up on my “I can’t imagine myself not having read this book” list.

So far I’ve read 16 of the 99 total. I’m thinking of some way to show my progress on this blog since it’s something I really want to complete.

So anyway, go check out the PMBA manifesto, start reading, and become just a bit more awesome with every page turn!

- James

PS. This is not an attack on MBA programmes, I think they have their place and can be very good choices for many people. However I also feel that in today’s world, the idea that you can have a monopoly on knowledge is silly. If I ever take an MBA I’ll let you know my opinion of MBA vs. PMBA but until that time I’ll take the knowledge I can get a hold of right now.

Did you like this article? Then share:

  • Print
  • PDF
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • MisterWong
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook